Dark Web Talk

CloudSafe — Anonymous encrypted image host

Started by CloudSafeHost · Nov 26, 2025

#3595
↳ Replying to @Yugong
I have different systems implemented on my server(s) and doing this would destroy them. I found a safe way that also works.

Every file getting their own encryption is more useful for me.
#3596
↳ Replying to @CloudSafeHost
Doesn't make sense you need to expand.

You should be able to restart the system. You should too by default have added LUKS.
#3597
↳ Replying to @Yugong
I'm sorry, but I still have physical protection against getting into the server, without the power being cut. This is my method and you don't have to like it. Restarting will always work, but I will have to inject the key, as I already said for the website to decrypt the files.

I would appreciate if you could approve the main post again. :)
#3598
↳ Replying to @CloudSafeHost
You're hosting this at your own place? It's highly unadvised for public service.

Every time you make changes to the post it goes back to queue automatically as something seems to be triggering it.

Users should be made aware your service isn't under LUKS encryption and it's self hosted not in a data center.
#3599
↳ Replying to @Yugong
Who said, I have no access to a data center. :) I will add the notice with the LUKS encryption in the red box, I'm trying to be as transparent as I can without harming myself.
#3600
↳ Replying to @CloudSafeHost
Colocation has a physical element to it increasing the risk. While it isn't on the level of a DNM, it's something to be considered.

You can achieve a lot more than whats set out with LUKS, couple scripts and some firmware modifications. Post is approved but users should be aware of these caveats.
#3601
↳ Replying to @Yugong
I advocate for a strict Zero Trust mindset where users should exercise caution with sensitive data regardless of the host (dump.li, Eternal or mine for example).

Regarding the physical threat vector, my infrastructure is configured to ensure that physical access can be only resulted after the power is cut. This highlights the specific tactical advantage of my architecture over standard LUKS, which offers no protection once the volume is mounted and the server is running.
#3603
↳ Replying to @CloudSafeHost
They ain’t gettin’ into that server, fam. Not unless the whole ting shuts down. Trust me, I got this.

Members-only continuation

This discussion contains more posts.

Create an account or sign in to continue reading the full conversation. 14 additional posts await inside.

Create an accountSign in