Minimum 'cooldown' time after order before making another one?

If the first one arrived without problem why the fuck not ?

Wait some time. Too many orders within a close span of eachother will look suspicious, also, when you have those back to back or at the same time it might look more suspicious to LE. Aswell, as its not good to take a risk at loosing two packages at once, if they stop one package they might stop both.

Dont listen to anyone saying there is a cooldown time. Once your pack lands order another.

Once a pack lands you are in the clear. Some people think that getting packages is suspicious but to who? The post office that literally exists to deliver packages and mail? Shit, they are all good with a lot of packages coming through. It's what pays the bills man. There's hoarders getting 50 amazon packages a week or more, home based ebay stores shipping and receiving tons of packages from their home, regular folks that don't like to venture out ordering paper towels and dog food.

There is nothing suspicious about getting packages or the amount of packages you get. Now the package itself could be suspicious if it's leaking, reeks of drugs, sketchy return address, over taped, fake names, etc. but having packages come to your house is completely normal in their world.

Just only have one dark net pack coming at a time though.

Yea, imagine getting mail two days in a row. Definitely criminal!

[removed]

how is getting 2 packages in 2 weeks suspicious lol what the fuck are you talking about

because if one gets intercepted they will open all the other packages and if you have 2 drug packages it will be much harder to defend yourself compared to if you only have 1

Traditional wisdom has always been once your pack arrives, you're safe to order another.

However, things are changing. It's up to you whether you follow the old wisdom or not.

The article posted in /post/c4f33106573b2e5a6f25 shows that without a doubt the USPIS is retaining shipping history for at least 12 months and is actively tracking (in some jurisdictions at least) packages sent from postage providers that accept crypto. In this case, they were able to see that the person they caught with one package (of 140 pills) also had received 46 packages likely paid with crypto postage in the last year and that was supplemental information used to help justify setting up a controlled delivery.

There were other red flags on the package that a good vendor hopefully would avoid (like a fake return address), but the other facts remain.

Yes, the post office deals with a huge volume of packages. Yes, if you're small time you probably won't get hassled. But the fact remains that they are retaining, correlating, and using this type of data now in ways they have not been before.

As for what to do with this information, that's up to you. I personally would try to keep DNM order volume to an absolute minimum from vendors that have a great reputation for stealth and good shipping practice. Good luck!

i disagree. whats ur defense against 1 drug package with ur name n address on it? someone who hates u is sending it to set u up? that defense holds for more than 1 drug package. its actually stronger if they find multiple packages. theyre not going to prosecute u for 1-2 packages of drugs. the address is burned, send em somewhere else, eventually theyll stop looking n u can order to ur address again. if ur opsec is any good they wont be able to prove anything other than a package (or 2) addressed to u had drugs in it. it woudlnt matter if they found 2-3 packs in transit to u at that time. 1 is enough to start looking, n when they look theyll find that uve had dozens of potential drug shipments in the last year and then theyll set up a controlled delivery. whether they discover 1 or 4 box's heading to ur address. so it really doesnt matter.